| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Failover plugin in 2.4.7.3 |
CastB
Replies: 2
Views: 7235
|
 Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:51 am Subject: Failover plugin in 2.4.7.3 |
1. Brekeke Product Name and Version: 2.4.7.3/286.1
Hi,
We do have the BKK Sip Server advanced edition version: 2.4.7.3/286.1.
Is the Failover plugin available in this version?
Do we have to ... |
| Topic: registrar adress based on via header? |
CastB
Replies: 5
Views: 6075
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 4:26 am Subject: registrar adress based on via header? |
Thanks for your anwser!
If i use another softphone the registration is correct. The ONLY difference i see is in the VIA header.
We are able to make it work on our softphone by rewriting the add ... |
| Topic: registrar adress based on via header? |
CastB
Replies: 5
Views: 6075
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 8:17 am Subject: registrar adress based on via header? |
Hi,
The remote IP address of UA is correct. It is the 172.29 address, see trace below and this detail in particular:
172.29.0.6.6022 > 172.29.0.1.5070: UDP, length 443
So, i still assume t ... |
| Topic: registrar adress based on via header? |
CastB
Replies: 5
Views: 6075
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 5:02 am Subject: registrar adress based on via header? |
1. Brekeke Product Name and version: BSS 2.4.7.3/286.1
2. Java version: 1.6.0_17
3. OS type and the version: 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5.centos.plus
4. UA (phone), gateway or other hardware/software ... |
| Topic: IPSEC Brekeke answers with public address |
CastB
Replies: 13
Views: 9513
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:24 am Subject: same problem |
Hello Tschaikowskinksi,
We do have the same situation. Were you able to solve it or does someone else knows how to do this?
Thanks |
| Topic: rule to force bkk NOT to rewrite sdp |
CastB
Replies: 3
Views: 3148
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:08 am Subject: rule to force bkk NOT to rewrite sdp |
Hi Harold,
Thanks, this works exactly as i wanted it. Great!
Is there somewhere a list of all the dialplan rules? I could not find this one anywhere in the documentation. |
| Topic: rule to force bkk NOT to rewrite sdp |
CastB
Replies: 3
Views: 3148
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:02 am Subject: rule to force bkk NOT to rewrite sdp |
1. Brekeke Product Name and version: Brekeke SIP Server advanced 2.4.7.3/286.1
2. Java version: 1.6.0_17
3. OS type and the version: Linux 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5.centos.plus
4. UA (phone), gatew ... |
| Topic: selective Nat traversal in dial plan |
CastB
Replies: 6
Views: 5357
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 1:27 am Subject: selective Nat traversal in dial plan |
> Do you want to receive keep-alive packets at the certain SIP UA?
> And do you not want to receive them at others?
Yes that is exactly what i want!
And, your suggested dialplan did the ... |
| Topic: selective Nat traversal in dial plan |
CastB
Replies: 6
Views: 5357
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:54 am Subject: selective Nat traversal in dial plan |
Hi,
I did not get this to work. This is what i tried:
Matching pattern:
$request=^REGISTER
To=<sip:dummy_1@
Deploy Pattern
user-agent=pipo2
$nat=true
$action=register
$continue=true ... |
| Topic: selective Nat traversal in dial plan |
CastB
Replies: 6
Views: 5357
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 1:06 pm Subject: selective Nat traversal in dial plan |
| Thanks, going to try it |
| Topic: selective Nat traversal in dial plan |
CastB
Replies: 6
Views: 5357
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:00 am Subject: selective Nat traversal in dial plan |
1. Brekeke Product Name and version: Brekeke SIP Server advanced 2.4.7.3/286.1
2. Java version: 1.6.0_17
3. OS type and the version: Linux 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5.centos.plus
4. UA (phone), gatew ... |
| Topic: t_registered table question |
CastB
Replies: 4
Views: 23521
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Fri May 27, 2011 2:48 pm Subject: t_registered table question |
Ok, that explains it, thanks.
So i assume there is no problem if i delete the expired records directly from the database by using a schedule or something.
Do you know what the awake field does? ... |
| Topic: t_registered table question |
CastB
Replies: 4
Views: 23521
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 7:09 am Subject: t_registered table question |
1. Brekeke Product Name and version: Brekeke SIP Server advanced 2.4.7.3/286.1
2. Java version: 1.6.0_17
3. OS type and the version: Linux 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5.centos.plus
4. UA (phone), gatew ... |
| Topic: Database query in dialplan |
CastB
Replies: 10
Views: 7324
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:04 pm Subject: Database query in dialplan |
That explains a lot 
We just ordered the advanced license
Thanks all for the help. |
| Topic: Database query in dialplan |
CastB
Replies: 10
Views: 7324
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:56 pm Subject: Database query in dialplan |
> does "select aaa from bbb where 1=1;" return anything if run from database directly?
Yes
> change log level and check if the dial plan is used from sv.xxxx.log
We have sip, regi ... |
| Topic: Relay or not using STUN |
CastB
Replies: 19
Views: 15491
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:46 pm Subject: Relay or not using STUN |
>> I moved the dialplan rule to be the first rule to be executed and now it works:
>Do you mean the DialPlan rule solved your problem??
Yes, with this rule a P2P connection is establish ... |
| Topic: Relay or not using STUN |
CastB
Replies: 19
Views: 15491
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:02 am Subject: Relay or not using STUN |
I moved the dialplan rule to be the first rule to be executed and now it works:
mode:RTPrelay = auto
mode:Auth = auto
mode:NAT = auto
I am still wondering why BKK does not decide for ... |
| Topic: Database query in dialplan |
CastB
Replies: 10
Views: 7324
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:25 am Subject: Database query in dialplan |
Hi,
> put mysql-connector-java-5.1.14-bin.jar to tomcat\webapps\proxy\WEB-INF\lib\
> restart tomcat
> if there is any other dial plan set at sip server, put the one with database acces ... |
| Topic: Database query in dialplan |
CastB
Replies: 10
Views: 7324
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:07 am Subject: Database query in dialplan |
Hi Hope,
> does the query "select aaa from bbb where 1=1;" work if run it from mysql server db?
Yes
> Is "mydb" your database name?
Yes
>is there mysql db drive ... |
| Topic: Database query in dialplan |
CastB
Replies: 10
Views: 7324
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:49 am Subject: Database query in dialplan |
1. Brekeke Product Name and version: Sip Server 2.4.7.3/286.1
2. Java version: 1.6.0_17
3. OS type and the version: 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5.centos.plus
4. UA (phone), gateway or other hardware/so ... |
| Topic: 200OK sometimes not accepted |
CastB
Replies: 1
Views: 2226
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:46 pm Subject: 200OK sometimes not accepted |
1. Brekeke Product Name and version: Sip Server 2.4.7.3/286.1
2. Java version: 1.6.0_17
3. OS type and the version: 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5.centos.plus
4. UA (phone), gateway or other hardware/so ... |
| Topic: Relay or not using STUN |
CastB
Replies: 19
Views: 15491
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:20 pm Subject: Relay or not using STUN |
Hi Haddas,
I tried but it did not work, still relaying
> ®ister.contact.nat = false
What does this rule do exactly?
any other suggestions that i could try? |
| Topic: Relay or not using STUN |
CastB
Replies: 19
Views: 15491
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:18 am Subject: Relay or not using STUN |
>Have you enable callee's STUN?
Yes, i did and i am pretty sure that it works because p2p calls are working well if i force BKK to do not relay (using a dialplan rule)
Why does BKK not recog ... |
| Topic: Relay or not using STUN |
CastB
Replies: 19
Views: 15491
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:50 pm Subject: Relay or not using STUN |
Hi Haddas,
>Is the callee registered in the SIP Server?
>Is the callee behind NAT?
callee and caller are both registered and both behind NAT and both using STUN
>Set the followi ... |
| Topic: Relay or not using STUN |
CastB
Replies: 19
Views: 15491
|
Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 6:12 am Subject: Relay or not using STUN |
Hi Haddas,
We used several different UA's with same result. Here is an example (amsip softphone). First part is the initial invite from caller, second part is the invite as it is received bij calle ... |
| |
